Aviation Bodies Brand New Recommendation of Travel Restrictions a “Political Failure”

Aviations bodies say the new measures fall "far short of what it was supposed to deliver encouraging a restart of travel through effective coordination and proportionate predictable and non-discriminatory measures"

Following the adoption by European Affairs Ministers of a Council Recommendation on travel restrictions, the aviation sector has branded it a failure and issued a stark warning of the potential consequences.

A joint statement from the aviation bodies reads: “The council recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restriction of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, formally approved this morning, sets out some guidance to member states. Yet it falls far short of what it was supposed to deliver encouraging a restart of travel through effective coordination and proportionate predictable and non-discriminatory measures.

“Aviation bodies ACI EUROPE, Airlines for Europe (A4E) and IATA have strongly pushed for a common pre-departure COVID-19 testing framework to replace quarantine for passengers travelling from high risk, in order to re-establish freedom of movement in Europe. The current lack of coordination between member states has killed the nascent recovery of travel and tourism, those jeopardising millions of jobs associated with the sector.

Specifically, the recommendation:

  • does not propose to replace quarantines by testing effectively meaning borders remain closed
  • leaves the door open for member states to refuse entry to citizens travelling from other member states and also deals to harmonise the rules applicable for cross-border and domestic travel
  • conflicts with the principle of the EC communications of 13 May that travel restrictions should be lifted between areas that have equivalent epidemiological situations
  • ignores the ECDC opinion that travel restrictions and in particular quarantine are of “questionable effectiveness” when community transmission is ongoing which is currently the case across most of Europe
  • does not create a sufficient window of certainty for travellers, as member states have only committed to publishing information on new measures 24 hours prior to their entry into force, as opposed to the five days the commission had proposed

“These shortcomings are a political failure. The inability of the council to go beyond shallow coordination and establish a truly harmonised and workable framework is now beyond any doubt.

“Expectations for an effective solution now rest with the European commission, which has charged EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) and ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) with the development of an EU testing protocol for travel.

“ACI Europe, IATA and A4E support the testing protocol initiative which prevents an opportunity to address the risk of importation of cases from high risk areas to low risk areas for more effectively than quarantine and and the disastrous patchwork of responses between individual member.

“Under the mandate given to them by the European commission, EASA and the ECDC can now move forward with the framework needed to reverse the continued economic blows suffered by Europe as a result of a continued lack of a coordinated response and leadership from the European Council.

“Millions of workers in the transport and tourism sectors need the European union to take the lead in not only supporting its economic recovery from COVID-19 but also to defend the right to freedom of movement of EU citizens a core European principle.”